Today, in India, most of the people knows English language better, Even though they cannot speak, they can identify its words and its alphabets easily, because lessons of English language starts from primary level. But because of some family or financial problem, nearby half of them have to drop their education in the half. Some of them are educated from city side and some of them are from village side. Therefore some of them have very good English knowledge, but some of them have not so good English knowledge. Along with this, some of them have good grasping power to learn more, but some of them weak grasping power.
Having such kind of mixed background, if such people want to learn English, which kind of training will give expected result? Personal Training or Group Training? In Personal Training students are taught one-to-one as per their grasping power and in Group Training students are taught in group of 10-15 students as per syllabus or day-wise module.
SureEnglish says that only Personal Training is able to give expected result. If the students are from different background than how can the equal training be given to them under Group Training? In group training how can be said that every student get everything whatever is taught? But in Personal Training, every lesson is repeated until student doesn’t get it.
Group training is based on day-wise module / syllabus of that institute. Personal Training is based on the grasping power of students.
Therefore Personal Training is always better than Group Training for better result.